The Goldnam-Sachs Transcripts: Logic and the October Surprise

One can deduce the content of her speeches by simple logic.

 

Ask yourself this question:

Was she lecturing them on how they will be broken up if they continue with their greed or was she laying out policy whereby they can continue on their path and rake in even more profits?

I believe it was the latter simply because the baksters must have liked what they heard otherwise they would never have paid her for multiple speeches.

If I’m wrong and it is the former, then she easily cleans Bernie’s clock in the remaining contests.  If it is the former, she could have ended Bernie’s campaign back in October. If it is the former, it would be to her political advantage to release the transcripts. When have you ever known a Clinton to not use every political advantage at their disposal and go for their opponent’s jugular?

Logic dictates that it is the latter and releasing them would be the death knell of her ambitions.

Given that the transcripts would be toxic to Clinton’s Presidential bid, do you think we will ever see them? If Clinton is the Democratic Party’s nominee the answer is YES!

Remember, Heidi Cruz is an executive with Goldman-Sachs; expect an October Surprise.

Video included.

That is of course if she never actually gave any speeches.  One other option is that she showed up, collected a check and never said more than ten words.  They were outright bribes disguised as speaking fees.